Jiu

Jiu Jitsu Haus

CTNortheast

#2167

National Rank

846Academy Score · Elite

9Fighters

19Total Wins

Medals

1,382Avg Rating

Jits.gg Review

Jiu Jitsu Haus is a results-driven youth program with 9 competitors across 2 tournaments.

They win gold 30% of the time, finish 56% of wins by submission, retain 44% of first-time competitors.

A technically advanced program in CT — the competition results speak for themselves.

Competitive Intelligence

Tournament Performance

Gold Medal
Rate

Win rate across 2 tracked tournaments, benchmarked against small-size academies.

30%GOLD MEDAL RATE▲ 19 vs similar academies

2GOLD MEDALS

Among 7948 small academies, above average gold rate.

30%

-3% below CT Avg

CT Avg 33%

Jiu Jitsu Haus 30%

Global Avg 40%

Small Avg 11%

100%

Jiu Jitsu Haus has won 2 gold medals across 44 entries in 2 tournaments.Gold medal rate measures how often fighters reach the top of the podium — a 30% rate means roughly 1 in 3 tournament entries end in gold.This is a foundational metric for evaluating any competition program.

Submission
Culture

Finish rate, scoring patterns, and how Jiu Jitsu Haus closes out victories.

56%FINISH RATE▲ 7 vs similar academies

15TOTAL SUBMISSIONS

Similar-size avg: 48%

Submission

15 · 56%

regional · 53%

Points

11 · 41%

regional · 47%

Decision

1 · 4%

Jiu Jitsu Haus fighters don't just win — they finish.56% of all wins come by submission: armbars, chokes, leg locks. That's a direct measure of technical depth — not stalling, not riding advantages.Based on 27 tracked win methods across all competitions.

Academy Roster

Roster
Depth

Fighter tier distribution across the competitive roster.

7RANKED FIGHTERS

2ELITE+ TIER

29% of roster is Elite or higher

THIS ACADEMY7

43%

29%

14%

CT Avg Academy7

57%

14%

43% Novice(3)

29% Advanced(2)

14% Elite(1)

14% Prodigy(1)

Every Jiu Jitsu Haus fighter is ranked against all fighters at their belt level nationwide. 3 fighters rank in the top 5% nationally (Elite or above).The deep bench of 0 Prospects and 2 Veterans is the pipeline. Most academies are top-heavy in one tier.Jiu Jitsu Haus produces competitors at every level.

Belt
Breakdown

Performance metrics segmented by belt level.

10ACTIVE FIGHTERS

2BELT LEVELS

Strongest: White (7 fighters)

0%25%50%75%100%

White7

▲32▼10

Grey3

▼11▲12

Gold Rate

Sub Rate

Small Avg

Performance metrics broken down by belt level reveal where this academy's training is most effective. Look for consistent gold rates and submission rates across belts — it signals a program that develops fighters at every stage.

Academy Operations

Fighter
Retention

What percentage of athletes return after their first competition.

44%RETURN RATE▲ 10 vs similar academies

4RETURNING FIGHTERS

Similar-size avg: 34%

44%

+15% above CT Avg

CT Avg 29%

Jiu Jitsu Haus 44%

Global Avg 52%

Small Avg 34%

100%

Retention measures whether fighters come back after their first tournament. At Jiu Jitsu Haus, 44% return to compete again.Building retention comes from positive tournament experiences — when kids feel prepared rather than thrown to the wolves.This metric signals whether families see enough value to continue investing in competitive training.

Development
Pipeline

Cross-belt consistency and ranking performance.

1%CONSISTENCY▲ 1 vs similar academies

#2167NATIONAL RANK

Similar-size avg: 0%

of academies

#2167

National

power rank

845.7

Power Score

CT avg: 56.6 · Global: 40.5

Performance is strongest at specific belt levels at Jiu Jitsu Haus. That's not uncommon — many programs have pockets of excellence at certain belts.Multi-belt consistency tracks whether quality is spread evenly or concentrated. A higher score means the program works at every level.Specialization isn't necessarily bad, but families should know which belt levels the program excels at.

How we know

0Competition entries

36Tracked matches

2Tournaments

1Organizations

2025Data window

Top Fighters

#		Fighter	Belt					St
1	3,811Prodigy	Brandon Ceperley	White	12-3	80%	83%	211	CT	–
2	2,112Elite	Joseph Baglio	Grey	2-1	67%	100%	1	CT	–
3	1,675Advanced	John Burns	Blue	1-1	50%	100%	1	CT	–
4	1,562Advanced	Lj Baglio	Grey	2-1	67%	50%	1	CT	–
5	1,223Novice	Cameron Buzzetto	Grey	1-3	25%	–		CT	–
6	1,047Novice	Matteo Rummo	Grey	1-2	33%	–	1	CT	–
7	1,011Novice	Edward Knapp	White	0-2	–	–	1	CT	–
8	0Beginner	Blake Staples	White	0-2	–	–	1	CT	–

CT Top 10

Roster & Results

#		Fighter	Belt					St
1	3,811Prodigy	Brandon Ceperley	White	12-3	80%	83%	211	CT	–
2	2,112Elite	Joseph Baglio	Grey	2-1	67%	100%	1	CT	–
3	1,675Advanced	John Burns	Blue	1-1	50%	100%	1	CT	–
4	1,562Advanced	Lj Baglio	Grey	2-1	67%	50%	1	CT	–
5	1,223Novice	Cameron Buzzetto	Grey	1-3	25%	–		CT	–
6	1,047Novice	Matteo Rummo	Grey	1-2	33%	–	1	CT	–
7	1,011Novice	Edward Knapp	White	0-2	–	–	1	CT	–
8	0Beginner	Blake Staples	White	0-2	–	–	1	CT	–
9	0Beginner	Jesse Buzzetto	White	0-2	–	–		CT	–