Jits.GG
FightersAcademiesTournamentsRatingsBlogMission
CtrlK

Explore

  • Rankings
  • Tournaments
  • Academies
  • Match Videos
  • Bracket Spy

Organizations

  • IBJJF
  • JJWL
  • ADCC

Resources

  • Mission
  • Ratings
  • Guides
  • Devlog
  • First Tournament
  • Belt System
  • Choosing an Academy

Legal

  • Legal
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Community Guidelines
  • About Our Data
  • Data Corrections
  • Contact

Your Matches. Your Medals. Your Rivals.

Only at Jits.gg

2026 Jits.gg
Dallas, TX
@jitsdotgg
LegalPrivacyContact
Academies/Backwoods Combat Collective
Bac

Backwoods Combat Collective

#6557
National Rank
90Academy Score · Elite
5Fighters
15Total Wins
32
Medals
1,834Avg Rating
Jits.gg Review

Backwoods Combat Collective is a results-driven youth program with 5 competitors across 1 tournaments.

They win gold 14% of the time, finish 87% of wins by submission.

A technically advanced program in the area — the competition results speak for themselves.

01
Competitive Intelligence
Tournament Performance

Gold Medal
Rate

Win rate across 1 tracked tournaments, benchmarked against small-size academies.

14%GOLD MEDAL RATE▲ 3 vs similar academies
3GOLD MEDALS

Among 7948 small academies, above average gold rate.

14%
-25% below Global Avg
Backwoods Combat Collective 14%
Global Avg 40%
Small Avg 11%
0%
100%
Backwoods Combat Collective has won 3 gold medals across 21 entries in 1 tournaments.Gold medal rate measures how often fighters reach the top of the podium — a 14% rate means roughly 1 in 7 tournament entries end in gold.This is a foundational metric for evaluating any competition program.

Submission
Culture

Finish rate, scoring patterns, and how Backwoods Combat Collective closes out victories.

87%FINISH RATE▲ 38 vs similar academies
13TOTAL SUBMISSIONS

Similar-size avg: 48%

Submission
13 · 87%
Points
2 · 13%
Decision
0 · 0%
Backwoods Combat Collective fighters don't just win — they finish.87% of all wins come by submission — that puts Backwoods Combat Collective in the top 25% of academies nationwide. Armbars, chokes, leg locks: the technique works under pressure.Based on 15 tracked win methods across all competitions.
Academy Roster

Roster
Depth

Fighter tier distribution across the competitive roster.

5RANKED FIGHTERS
1ELITE+ TIER

20% of roster is Elite or higher

THIS ACADEMY5
20%
20%
40%
20%
20% Novice(1)
20% Prospect(1)
40% Advanced(2)
20% Elite(1)
5 fighters at Backwoods Combat Collective are ranked against the national field at their belt level.Tier distribution shows where fighters fall relative to all competitors nationwide. Elite and Prodigy tiers represent the top performers, while Prospects and Veterans show developing talent with upward trajectory.Building depth across tiers is how programs develop long-term competitive pipelines.
02
Top Fighters
#FighterBeltM/FSt
1
3,034Elite
Josh VandeneykelWhite5-0
100%
100%
2
–
2
2,067Advanced
Michael FieldingWhite4-2
67%
100%
1
–
3
1,837Advanced
Alex NiemelaWhite2-0
100%
100%
1
–
4
1,181Prospect
Caleb MostromWhite2-2
50%
50%
–
5
1,052Novice
Cort CookWhite2-2
50%
50%
1
–
05
Roster & Results
#FighterBeltM/FSt
1
3,034Elite
Josh VandeneykelWhite5-0
100%
100%
2
–
2
2,067Advanced
Michael FieldingWhite4-2
67%
100%
1
–
3
1,837Advanced
Alex NiemelaWhite2-0
100%
100%
1
–
4
1,181Prospect
Caleb MostromWhite2-2
50%
50%
–
5
1,052Novice
Cort CookWhite2-2
50%
50%
1
–
08
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Backwoods Combat Collective has 5 tracked competitors on Jits.gg.
Backwoods Combat Collective is ranked #6557 nationally on Jits.gg with a power score of 90.0.
Backwoods Combat Collective competitors have earned 3 gold, 2 bronze medals in tracked tournaments.
///
Embed Widget

Track Backwoods Combat Collective's competitive performance

[ Premium Intelligence ]

Unlock Premium Academy Intelligence

Request early access to premium features for Backwoods Combat Collective
  • ✓Embeddable ranking widget for your website
  • ✓Weekly performance reports COMING SOON
  • ✓Competitor intelligence alerts COMING SOON

Starting at $29/mo

Or: Claim this academy →
Report an issue with this page
V5